4/10 Malo
Michael L.
22 may. 2024
Le gustó: Limpieza
Misleading and a poor value
I don't recommend this unit or these hosts.
This unit is billed as "brand new," but it's clearly an aging 1960s or 70s apartment unit that's been lightly renovated. Old is fine, but the listing isn't accurate.
It's also billed as a "luxury" unit. It's actually an inexpensive, snug one-bedroom with thin walls, a smattering of cheap furniture, an awkward layout, and a noisy family above. The kitchen and a few other features have been recently updated, but they're basic and serviceable. It's fine - a place you might crash as a college student on a budget - but it's neither "new" nor "luxury."
"Included" soap and shampoo was actually a half-empty bottle of shampoo - there was no soap. A carbon monoxide sensor battery was dead/dying, and the unit beeped annoyingly. Check-in included instructions to park in a numbered spot outside the unit. None were numbered; most were already occupied.
The bedroom was listed as featuring a "king bed and queen bed." The fine print points out that the queen is an optional air mattress. That's ok: portable sleep options are common in rentals. But the room description clearly implies that the bedroom fits both the king and queen - again, no. The air mattress only fits by the front door.
The only upside: it was clean inside.
With "host fees," two nights in this humble spot exceeded what I would have paid for a modern hotel suite. Don't make my mistake. NOTE: we used the unit for only 2 hours, checking out early for unrelated reasons.
Michael L.
Se hospedó 2 noches en mayo de 2024